| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus M32CD4-K (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK M32CD4-K |
| Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170106 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 11 '19 at 14:31 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.8%
Very good
|
70% 116 Pts
|
45% 339 Pts
|
22% 354 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 200B) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.16
|
56.4%
Above average
|
57% 65.9 fps
|
56% 68.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB3i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 161 160 164 157 159 MB/s
|
79.1%
Very good
|
53% 237 MB/s
|
146% 55.8 MB/s
|
170% 234 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
752GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 192 176 191 192 191 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
108% 150 MB/s
|
147% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
OWC Envoy 500GB
391GB free, PID 338a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 251 254 258 255 251 MB/s
|
161%
Outstanding
|
369% 279 MB/s
|
1,183% 15.7 MB/s
|
1,290% 17 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
71.9%
Very good
|
73% 25.7 GB/s
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
58% 68.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 693 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus M32CD4-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $90Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 395x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 266x |
| Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 207x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 91x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 51x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $192 |