MSI MS-1759

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE70 2PE
MotherboardMSI MS-1759  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150413
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 17:42
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 185
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 441
50% 391 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1109) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4889
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 6.97
3% 9.09 fps
MRender 9.62
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.35
6% 6.81 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 396 335 319 321 309 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 408
Mixed 263
SusWrite 338
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 38.1
141% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 126
137% 229 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 116%
StoreJet Transcend 250GB
122GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 23 22 22 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 20.3
Mixed 21
SusWrite 21.5
29% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 19.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1759 Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1759

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback