Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 15:00
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 281
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 798
72% 608 Pts
64-Core 796
49% 796 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.8% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 111
Parallax 105
83% 106 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 93.5
Splatting 95.3
77% 94 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 34 31 34 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 438
Write 98
Mixed 170
SusWrite 33.5
40% 185 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 17.4
110% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 48
52% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 72%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
69GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 34 34 32 34 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 440
Write 185
Mixed 221
SusWrite 33.8
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 17.3
105% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 17.1
37% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 72%
FTM64GX25H 64GB
48GB free
Firmware: 2142
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 33 32 34 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.7% Above average
Read 444
Write 188
Mixed 216
SusWrite 33.2
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 17.4
109% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 18.6
41% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
229GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 33 32 34 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 435
Write 189
Mixed 225
SusWrite 35.1
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 17.4
110% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 18
55% 119 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 254%
SiImage 120GB
65GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 33 32 34 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 436
Write 186
Mixed 204
SusWrite 33.4
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 16.7
89% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 18.1
42% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 20.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $747
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback