Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK AH531/GFO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK AH531/GFO  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB10
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 10:41
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 89.1
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 107
57% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 167
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15EA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 435
Mixed 358
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 32.4
113% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 346
261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Toshiba MQ01ABC1 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 102 100 102 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 97
Write 83.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 101
56% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 10.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK AH531/GFO Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK AH531/GFO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback