Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 89
2-Core 165
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 477
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4691
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 6.06
6% 8.17 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 11.3
7% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Reeinno MC20 480GB S6N8
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 261 207 522 623 802 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,612
Write 302
Mixed 196
SusWrite 452
138% 640 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 40.9
157% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 36.1
204% 477 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 171%
Great: 171%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 138 138 138 138 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 135
Write 139
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 138
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
190% 2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
35GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 38 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 33.8
Write 35.2
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 37.5
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.3
114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 66%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
267GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 174 174 166 178 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 151
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 172
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 100%
Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion Desk 1TB
48GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 119 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 120
Write 90.3
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 117
134% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 71%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00M4B0 1TB
15GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 34 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 26.5
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 35.6
39% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback