Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 23 '19 at 14:45
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 190
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 643
65% 528 Pts
64-Core 784
48% 784 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SP SolidState Disk 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 11 88 9.1 40 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 386
Write 169
Mixed 183
SusWrite 47.7
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 12.8
83% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 12.6
57% 125 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60
11GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 63 63 51 65 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 68
Write 30
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 59.2
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MPAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 114 117 116 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 107
Write 95.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 115
61% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 39.7
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback