Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5545M APU 2,749 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 60.8 1-Core 18.9 2-Core 71.8 33% 50.5 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 127 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 44%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu F500-128GB 128GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1205A SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 46 45 45 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 404 Write 85.7 Mixed 144 SusWrite 54.1 37% 172 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 13.4 47% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 63.8 DQ Mixed 99.7 72% 94.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung I9E5403-02X.A00LF 1x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-5545M APUAMDBench 36%, 2,749 samples	10x

GPU
Radeon HD 8510GAMDBench 3%, 2,125 samples	4x
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7670AMDBench 6%, 3,465 samples	1x

SSD
VERTEX2 40GBOCZBench 30%, 135 samples	2x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	2x
SD7TN3Q-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 77%, 1,540 samples	1x

RAM
Skill Intl F3-10666CL7-2GBRH 2x2GBGBench 22%, 4 samples	2x
CT51264BA160B.C16F 12GBUnknownBench 40%, 51 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16