Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 66 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 171 61% 108 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 690 62% 520 Pts	64-Core 1,342 83% 1,342 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Lighting 41.3 Reflection 31.6 Parallax 38.5 34% 37.1 fps	MRender 39.7 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 36.9 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 379GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2406 727 628 627 627 628 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	298% Outstanding	Read 2,572 Write 2,208 Mixed 1,763 SusWrite 940 418% 1,871 MB/s	4K Read 62.6 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 81.4 277% 97.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,264 DQ Write 1,045 DQ Mixed 1,101 839% 1,137 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 298% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 1TB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1257 1175 1005 862 743 747 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 1,493 Write 1,272 Mixed 1,254 SusWrite 965 280% 1,246 MB/s	4K Read 64.4 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 85.7 293% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,366 DQ Write 1,140 DQ Mixed 1,222 924% 1,243 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 372%
RAID1 1.5TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 516 516 517 518 518 518 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 582 Write 519 Mixed 518 SusWrite 517 120% 534 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 39.9 129% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 409 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 356 273% 372 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C... 130GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 19.7 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	321x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x