Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '19 at 05:59
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 69
2-Core 127
54% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 217
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2201.0
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 13
4% 8.41 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 5.48
5% 6.66 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F500S-120GB 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 21 17 24 24 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 344
Write 55.8
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 23.2
23% 107 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 13.2
40% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-002.A 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XN-WIFI Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI - $118

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback