Siemens SIMATIC Field PG M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSiemens SIMATIC Field PG M4  (all builds)
MotherboardSIEMENS A5E31759447
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140603
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 13:07
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
PGA998B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 160
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 233
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Intel(8086 0166) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3355
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 3.19
4% 4.66 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.74
5% 5.61 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 300GB-$289
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 187 175 155 120 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 236
Write 184
Mixed 184
SusWrite 160
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 20.1
62% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 68.1
DQ Mixed 70.5
60% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 54%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
353GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 50
Write 37.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 62.4
63% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
58GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 19 26 19 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 42
Write 50.7
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 22
48% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
58% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SGN08G64B6BB2SA-DC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.6
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SIMATIC Field PG M4 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Siemens SIMATIC Field PG M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback