Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2.65GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.65GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1 GB free of 2.65039 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 15:18
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5010U
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 112
47% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 122
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Intel(8086 2057) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Lighting 5.23
Reflection 4.58
Parallax 7.12
4% 5.65 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 5.87
Splatting 8
5% 6.19 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 64GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 24 35 29 28 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 58%
Red Hat VirtIO 4GB
3GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1858
Write 91.1
Mixed 1,903
282% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 18.4
86% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 22.4
DQ Mixed 38.4
26% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback