HP 700-414

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP 700-414 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory	4.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140718
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '19 at 16:01
Run Duration	282 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 99.3 2-Core 195 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 351 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2AF7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3621 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 6.04 Parallax 6.06 4% 5.53 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.13 4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 54 40 31 18 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 149 Write 142 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 39.4 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 114%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 28GB free, PID 0074 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	4.72% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 10.2 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 6.6 14% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.72% Great: 13%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 4GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 0059 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.4 5.3 5.4 5.2 5.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Read 35.6 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 5.3 11% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 42% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 9%
USB Flash Memory 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6 6 5.9 6 6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.7% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 7 Mixed 7.2 SusWrite 6 11% 9.12 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.7% Great: 6%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -0 2GB 0GB free, PID 0301 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 17.2 Write 15 Mixed 13.5 19% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 33% 1.57 MB/s

TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,032 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 104GB free, PID 0201 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 24.8 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 16.6 29% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 44%
Hitachi HTS722020K9SA00 200GB 36GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 17 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.7% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 24.8 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 16.4 29% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 70% 0.87 MB/s

WD My Passport 0814 1TB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 17GB free, PID 0814 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 54 55 55 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 56.1 Write 57.3 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 55.2 71% 52.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 44%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 0301 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.2 8.2 8.1 7.8 8.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	5.71% Terrible	Read 22 Write 8.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 8.1 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.71% Great: 10%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 244GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.7 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.92% Terrible	Read 34.8 Write 29.5 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 8.6 32% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 9.92% Great: 59%
Flash Drive SK_USB20 4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 8628 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	8.25% Terrible	Read 26.8 Write 7 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 13.4 15% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.25% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GB 763 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700-414 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP 700-414

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	123x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	5x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	41x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	10x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	6x

SSD
850 EVO mSATA 1TBSamsungBench 105%, 1,324 samples	8x
ssd 512GBBench 73%, 4,609 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $43Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 12GBHynixBench 39%, 266 samples	17x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 12GBMicronBench 41%, 119 samples	16x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 41%, 388 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $114

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16