Today's hottest deals

Asus UX31E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus UX31E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX31E
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '16 at 00:46
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2677M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 91.1
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 134
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 166
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1427) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2476
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.23
Parallax 1.12
2% 2.12 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 1.22
1% 1.79 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 456
Write 308
Mixed 330
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 8.64
4K Mixed 6.12
33% 9.47 MB/s
DQ Read 39.1
DQ Write 7.93
DQ Mixed 6.62
9% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 15.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX31E Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX31E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback