Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario RZ537AA-ABA SR5010NX (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS Livermore
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '19 at 04:52
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz 3,160 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	22% Poor	Memory 38.2 1-Core 23.9 2-Core 29.5 22% 30.5 Pts	4-Core 34.8 8-Core 35.5 5% 35.2 Pts	64-Core 30.4 2% 30.4 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB 2,425 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 44 32 31 34 24 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 50.8 Write 45.7 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 35.3 29% 40 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 32%
Memorex TRAVELDRIVE 005B 4GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 1e23 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.2 7.5 7 7.4 7.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	4.37% Terrible	Read 12.2 Write 5.7 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 7.4 9% 7.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.37% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB 0h DDR2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron D 3.46GHzIntelBench 23%, 141 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,147 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x