ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16H4

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Micro-Star GS60 2PL
Motherboard	MSI MS-16H4 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '16 at 02:03
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 200 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 439 52% 401 Pts	64-Core 446 28% 446 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 1102) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.64% Terrible	Lighting 5.07 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 6.91 4% 8.71 fps	MRender 9.86 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.09 6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.64% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 53 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 10 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 55 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1286734328
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NU 256GB 1,940 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 33GB free Firmware: JUXA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8132 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 743 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 193 193 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 58 (C2) HDA temperature 46 39 261993857078 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	69.5% Good	Read 484 Write 89.2 Mixed 216 57% 263 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 39.3 115% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 147 119% 172 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G 0420 MIF4D1D167HZ1 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.1 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 18.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-16H4 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16H4

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	27x
Core i5-4210HIntelBench 55%, 12,540 samples	7x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	6x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	35x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	5x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	1x

SSD
HG6 SATA M.2 128GBToshibaBench 76%, 5,880 samples	3x
RBU-SNS8100S3128GD1 128GBKingstonBench 63%, 932 samples	3x
HFS256G38MNB-2200A 256GBBench 66%, 130 samples	2x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	9x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 19,744 samples	7x
MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 1,789 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback