Today's hottest deals

Asus N750JV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus N750JV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N750JV
Memory1.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130807
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 14:26
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 84
2-Core 104
50% 82 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 297
26% 219 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 129D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 6.41
3% 6.64 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.76 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83.5
Write 59.5
Mixed 41.7
46% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.7
Write 43.2
Mixed 25.4
26% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 63%
StoreJet Transcend 750GB
84GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 16 24 16 28 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.38% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 14
Mixed 16
SusWrite 19.8
23% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
48% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.38%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-052.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N750JV Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N750JV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback