Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1792

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE72 2QC
MotherboardMSI MS-1792  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '19 at 22:00
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 112
2-Core 204
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 467
53% 417 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
MSI(1462 1139) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 7.62
5% 10.4 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 7.57
5% 6.09 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39MND-3310A 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20001P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 289 368 359 367 367 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 370
Mixed 317
SusWrite 348
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 32.8
120% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 277
230% 331 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 93%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
832GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 120 118 120 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 100
Write 110
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 118
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1792 Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1792

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback