Today's hottest deals

Notebook W230ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook W230ST  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W230ST
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 23:30
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 176
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 465
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0230) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 6.44
3% 8.44 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.17
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 mSATA 120GB-$398
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 129 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 429
Write 138
Mixed 195
SusWrite 126
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 33.7
129% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 153
126% 182 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 73%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
910GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 130 127 126 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 138
Write 134
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 129
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W230ST Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W230ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback