HP ZBook 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook 17  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 190A
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '19 at 09:19
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 183
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 448
50% 394 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3100M
HP(103C 197A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 15.6
11% 13.8 fps
MRender 17.1
Gravity 16
Splatting 17.5
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 147 149 144 159 152 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.8% Poor
Read 190
Write 91.7
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 151
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 8.3
37% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 17
13% 18 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 9.6 9.7 8.4 8.4 8.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Read 27.4
Write 14
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 8.2
21% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 2.4
113% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB M471B5173BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 15.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 17 Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback