Asus P6X58-E PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6X58-E PRO  (all builds)
Memory43.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110728
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 02:24
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 117
2-Core 235
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 738
74% 603 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 3979) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 60.8
Parallax 55.1
54% 60.7 fps
Gravity 65
Splatting 52.7
51% 58.8 fps
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 226 226 225 226 226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 355
Write 224
Mixed 268
SusWrite 226
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 30
97% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 132
99% 133 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 64%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$74
477GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 124 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63% Good
Read 149
Write 154
Mixed 150
SusWrite 124
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 42.7
137% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 239
154% 176 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 63%
Great: 308%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,495
Write 4,534
Mixed 4,424
1,003% 4,484 MB/s
4K Read 366
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 221
936% 257 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 676
520% 712 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 192 191 191 192 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70% Very good
Read 259
Write 247
Mixed 246
SusWrite 191
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 38.7
124% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 184
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 70%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 1TB
833GB free
Firmware: RVT42B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 194 193 194 194 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
75.3% Very good
Read 261
Write 251
Mixed 250
SusWrite 193
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 43.5
141% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 128%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB-$146
894GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 160 160 160 160 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.2% Above average
Read 162
Write 164
Mixed 163
SusWrite 160
37% 162 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 32.3
104% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 243
162% 193 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x8GB
6 of 6 slots used
48GB DIMM
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 13.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58-E PRO Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P6X58-E PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $498
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback