Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M Pro4+  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '16 at 16:12
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 118
58% 91 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 204
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
32GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 268
Write 74.4
Mixed 112
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 10.9
59% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 9.9
11% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 69%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 249
Write 75.3
Mixed 114
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 5.76
77% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 12
18% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 69%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 320GB
30GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 29.4
Mixed 29
38% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.28
50% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M Pro4+ Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback