Dell PowerEdge T320

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemDell PowerEdge T320
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T320  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '19 at 15:35
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User dimakan01
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2407 0
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 63.2
35% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 229
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Nvidia(10DE 070E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 0.91
2% 2.54 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.83
2% 3.04 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$57
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 65 76 78 76 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 120
Write 82.3
Mixed 55
SusWrite 73.2
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.3
260% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 108%
Dell PERC S110 1TB
916GB free
Firmware: 3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 82 93 81 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 118
Write 89.8
Mixed 32
SusWrite 84
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B5673FH0-CH9 00CE00B300CE M393B5673EH1-CH9 00CE00B300CE M393B5673FH0-CH9 00CE00B300CE M393B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge T320 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback