Asus K53SV

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus K53SV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K53SV
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '19 at 17:52
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 160 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 408 45% 357 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 15F2) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 3.72 3% 4.19 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3 3% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 107GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 91 89 83 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 304 Write 341 Mixed 176 SusWrite 89.7 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 15.2 63% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 52.5 DQ Mixed 73 59% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 85%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 245GB free Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 86 88 86 89 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 453 Write 436 Mixed 244 SusWrite 88.2 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 33.6 110% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 228 188% 268 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 108%
SD Card 32GB 861 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 21GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 25 23 22 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 22.4 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 22.8 30% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 56% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 2x8GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.8% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 21.2 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 18.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K53SV Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SV

CPU
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	138x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	136x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	125x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	397x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	174x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	13x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	33x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	32x
SSA302G08-GDJEC 1x4GBAsintBench 27%, 631 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16