PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Base_board_manufacturer MODEL_NAME (all builds) |
Motherboard | EVGA 151-SE-E779 |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131206 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 11 '19 at 18:48 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
71.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
86%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 168 53 50 49 52 MB/s
|
95.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
13GB free
Firmware: WU100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 51 51 50 51 MB/s
|
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
381GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 132 131 132 132 MB/s
|
80.9%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
88GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 23 23 14 22 MB/s
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dimm0_Manufacturer Dimm0_ Dimm2_Manufacturer Dimm2_ Dimm4_Manufacturer Dimm4_ Dimm6_Manufacturer Dimm6_ 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72.5%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 27x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 25x |
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 28x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 11x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 10x |
SSD | |
---|---|
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBIntel $190Bench 217%, 33,949 samples | 27x |
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples | 8x |
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $75Bench 200%, 52,084 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $765 |