Today's hottest deals

Medion MS-7748

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMedion MS-7748  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7748
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 11 '19 at 20:29
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3820 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 81
43% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 158
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
MSI(1462 7748) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.900.0.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 4.62
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 5.78
4% 4.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 88 92 93 99 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 99.1
Mixed 76
SusWrite 92.7
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 68%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
57GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 50 51 50 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 72
Write 68
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 50.6
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 43%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
3TB free, PID 2323
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 121 121 123 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47% Average
Read 48
Write 107
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 121
122% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
180% 2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47%
Great: 58%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 1.5TB
842GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 106 106 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 95.3
Write 75.6
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 107
111% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7748 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7748

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback