Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	122GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 122GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Xen HVM domU (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	45.8 GB free of 122 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20060824
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '19 at 19:32
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E7-8880 v3 5 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 50.9 1-Core 53.5 2-Core 88.5 39% 64.3 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 175 19% 151 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
AWS PVDISK 537GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 280GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.9 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.9 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.3% Very poor	Read 89 Write 88.7 Mixed 148 SusWrite 10.2 19% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 8.5 33% 9.13 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 40%
AWS PVDISK 537GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 468GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 9.8 9.9 9.9 10 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.7% Very poor	Read 88 Write 88.6 Mixed 148 SusWrite 10 19% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 8.1 28% 7.77 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 40%
AWS PVDISK 322GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 236GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 8.5 6.5 9.9 10 10 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14% Very poor	Read 88.9 Write 89 Mixed 146 SusWrite 9.1 19% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 7.7 33% 9.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 70%
AWS PVDISK 215GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 69GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.9 9.8 9.9 9.9 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 106%
AWS PVDISK 215GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.6 9.5 9.9 9.9 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 106%
AWS PVDISK 161GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 149GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.9 9.8 9.9 10 9.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 122GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 10240 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 22.4 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 9.4 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	54x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

RAM
29GBUnknownBench 65%, 119 samples	26x
1x15GBUnknownBench 59%, 628 samples	14x
44GBUnknownBench 23%, 6,316 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406