Today's hottest deals

Asus CG1330

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CG1330  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG1330
Memory1.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110128
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 23:54
Run Duration671 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 80.1
46% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 191
22% 172 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 0915) 1GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 0.59
2% 1.71 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 1.61
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,483
Write 32.2
Mixed 60.3
110% 525 MB/s
4K Read 252
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.3
388% 86 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
222GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,492
Write 32.5
Mixed 60.3
110% 528 MB/s
4K Read 216
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.9
333% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
Lio-org FILEIO 1TB
201GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Read 16
Write 19.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 0.6
4% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.1
7% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 23%
Lio-org FILEIO 1TB
518GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4
Write 55
SusWrite 0.1
4% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 23%
Lio-org FILEIO 644GB
224GB free
Firmware: 4.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 525
Mixed 7.8
191% 266 MB/s
4K Read 160
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
6,664% 53.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
766GB free
Firmware: CC44
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 93
Mixed 59.8
63% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,491
Write 27.5
Mixed 53.5
376% 524 MB/s
4K Read 301
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.9
12,898% 102 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG1330 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CG1330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback