Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-MD80-TM0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MD80-TM0 (all builds)
Memory	59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '16 at 11:30
Run Duration	381 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 8 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 65.6 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 136 53% 89.7 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 479 45% 372 Pts	64-Core 1,204 74% 1,204 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 480GB-$180 3,042 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 220GB free Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 698 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 218 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 37 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 30 100 51543212062 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 37 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 111 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 44560 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 41 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 44560 (F2) Unknown 100 100 31944 (F9) Unknown 100 100 4275	61.1% Good	Read 506 Write 259 Mixed 282 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 15.7 59% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 92.4 DQ Mixed 53.9 67% 123 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 69%
Nvme INTEL SSDPE2ME40 400GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0131 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 1,657 Write 435 Mixed 664 199% 918 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 24.7 91% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 103 111% 185 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 163%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4.5TB free Firmware: SC23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 218942384 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 79 79 22069 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 53663515 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 14946 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 55 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 84 84 16 (BE) vendor-specific 76 42 90598473752 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 61 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 22069 (C2) HDA temperature 24 58 77309411352 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 45% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$56 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 134 134 21492924704 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 64 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8791 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 61 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 393 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 393 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 171799609371 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$56 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 133 133 21493252384 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 64 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8790 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 61 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 370 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 370 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 180389609499 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$56 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 132 132 25788219685 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 64 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8791 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 61 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 351 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 351 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 167504642076 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$56 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 135 135 21492793629 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 64 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8791 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 61 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 371 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 371 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 180389543965 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 173 7400 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 558 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1575 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 303 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 110 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11430 (C2) HDA temperature 122 105 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.1% Good	Read 114 Write 98.9 Mixed 117 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.28 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965589-008.D02G 9965589-008.D02G 9965589-037.D00G 9965589-037.D00G 9965589-037.D00G 9965589-037.D00G 9965589-008.D02G 9965589-008.D02G 64GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.3% Excellent	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 35 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback