Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '19 at 03:39
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 920 9 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 62.8 1-Core 35.1 2-Core 84.2 38% 60.7 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 152 21% 154 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 70%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 32GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,037 Write 852 Mixed 524 178% 804 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 14.3 52% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 175 133% 181 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 49%
Red Hat VirtIO 69GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 50GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,036 Write 74.2 Mixed 419 110% 510 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 10.6 4K Mixed 12.1 42% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 0.1 DQ Mixed 175 112% 136 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 13 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 3.8 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $499