Today's hottest deals

Panasonic CF-53JWX1CFG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPanasonic CF-53JWX1CFG  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF53-2
Memory5.8 GB free of 8.01563 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 11:08
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 131
59% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 220
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 2.94
3% 4.25 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.13
4% 5.15 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 256GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUPA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 198 197 195 196 192 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 204
Write 199
Mixed 196
SusWrite 196
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 20.3
62% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 36.7
DQ Mixed 25
20% 26.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 41%
Great: 109%
Toshiba THNSNF25 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: N102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 332 330 330 335 326 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 334
Write 339
Mixed 332
SusWrite 330
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 19.5
61% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 40.1
DQ Mixed 30.9
24% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-YH9 56GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-53JWX1CFG Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-53JWX1CFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback