Acer Aspire F5-771G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire F5-771G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer SpiderMan_SK
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateApr 03 '19 at 01:30
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 160
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 298
41% 302 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 65%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 111B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.13
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 2.97
3% 6.42 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 6.52
4% 4.45 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 187 218 193 198 201 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 366
Write 173
Mixed 168
SusWrite 191
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 18.9
83% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 165
157% 250 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 64 58 59 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
46% Average
Read 99.9
Write 64.2
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 60.4
47% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46%
Great: 62%
ST332041 8AS 320GB
298GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 31 27 28 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.7% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 32.6
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 28.3
39% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 17%
Toshiba External USB HDD 320GB
52GB free, PID a004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 28 22 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 21.9
Write 22.4
Mixed 15
SusWrite 22.6
28% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
48% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905663-008.A00G 859B CT16G4SFD8213.C16FDD 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-771G Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-771G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback