HP p7-1054

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1054  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory8.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110322
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateApr 05 '19 at 17:05
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 84
40% 63 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 157
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 56.1
52% 61.4 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 63.3
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Visionte k GoDrive 60GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 604A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 15 15 14 13 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12% Very poor
Read 59
Write 53.5
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 16.1
10% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 2.5
26% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.7
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 31.2
24% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 38%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 15 16 14 14 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 113
Write 81.5
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 16.9
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 84%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 96 100 101 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 97.9
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Ramaxel RMR1870EF48E8W1333 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.5% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1054 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1054

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback