Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 43.2 2-Core 61 40% 58.1 Pts	4-Core 73.9 8-Core 73.1 10% 73.5 Pts	64-Core 78.2 5% 78.2 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D 4,197 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 061D) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 5.23 Parallax 4.41 4% 4.88 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 3.97 Splatting 4.7 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 184 151 140 141 208 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.8% Poor	Read 92.7 Write 91.3 Mixed 67 SusWrite 154 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 8.6 33% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 15.4 DQ Write 16.1 DQ Mixed 14.3 11% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 100%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB 12,976 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 836GB free Firmware: 77.04D77 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 95 96 96 95 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 16.3 Write 57.5 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 93.5 41% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G 4x2GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.5% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 10.5 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.8 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	3x
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	1x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
ACR512X64D3U13C9G 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,166 samples	3x
ACR256X64D3U13C9G 4x2GBKingstonBench 44%, 134 samples	1x
HU564404EP0200 3x4GBUnifosaBench 34%, 17 samples	1x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28