Performance Results


Gaming 152% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 133% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7A58
Motherboard	MSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58) (all builds)
Memory	56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161207
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '19 at 19:19
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 153 2-Core 278 98% 175 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 824 82% 667 Pts	64-Core 824 51% 824 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Lighting 255 Reflection 186 Parallax 193 208% 211 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 166 Splatting 117 108% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 357GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1588 1570 1547 1438 1353 1308 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	328% Outstanding	Read 2,727 Write 1,735 Mixed 1,021 SusWrite 1,467 386% 1,738 MB/s	4K Read 51.1 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 72.7 256% 95.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,247 DQ Write 995 DQ Mixed 1,070 815% 1,104 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 328% Great: 363%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 430GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 474 478 487 487 487 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 476 Mixed 378 SusWrite 479 104% 460 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 60 204% 72.5 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 340 261% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 124%
Samsung PM871 2.5 7mm 512GB 221 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 155GB free Firmware: EMT03D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 487 487 486 486 484 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 462 Mixed 298 SusWrite 486 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 47.7 177% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 287 236% 338 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C15D4 4x16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 37.1 MC Mixed 31.1 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 40.6 SC Mixed 30.4 85% 29.7 GB/s	Latency 55.3 72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	13x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	11x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	6x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $857

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16