Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	30% Poor	Memory 27.9 1-Core 46.9 2-Core 87.8 30% 54.2 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 182 25% 184 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	2.2% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 2.38 2% 2.53 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 6.04 3% 3.56 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.2% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ZRW 128G 128GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0831B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 317 331 335 339 337 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 313 Write 323 Mixed 267 SusWrite 326 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 9.5 61% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 62.8 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 18 48% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 56%
ASMT 2115 2TB 1,348 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 136 137 136 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 149 Write 147 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 135 167% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 9.9 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 268 15% 268 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	13x
Pentium J4205IntelBench 35%, 25 samples	4x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	12x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16