Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-19N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L50-A-19N  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VG10S
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140919
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 19 '19 at 18:15
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 155
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 377
38% 308 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA47) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3282
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 7.42
Parallax 4.69
4% 5.54 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.07
Splatting 7.83
4% 4.96 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD360S 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20151027
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 268 268 282 276 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 425
Write 292
Mixed 172
SusWrite 276
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 11.5
48% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 22.6
DQ Mixed 10.6
10% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L50-A-19N Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-19N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback