Acer Aspire M5300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M5300  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FRX780M
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100818
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 00:22
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 85
45% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 242
25% 203 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
Sapphire(174B E150) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 19.8
18% 18.1 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 195 199 198 197 195 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63% Good
Read 244
Write 206
Mixed 209
SusWrite 195
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 142
106% 142 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 63%
Great: 124%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$83
16GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 65 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 70
Write 73
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 65.1
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
5GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 63 58 68 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 61.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 65.9
40% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$138
4GB free
Firmware: CC13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.8
Write 103
Mixed 59.7
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 16GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5300 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback