Positivo EC10IS1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPositivo EC10IS1  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Intel powered classmate PC
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140411
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 07 '16 at 06:30
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2600
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Memory 45.1
1-Core 6.9
2-Core 13.5
18% 21.8 Pts
4-Core 22.3
8-Core 22.6
3% 22.5 Pts
64-Core 22.9
1% 22.9 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600
Elitegroup(1019 9988)
Driver: imghal64.dll Ver. 8.15.8.1050
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 0.38
1% 0.55 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.2a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.5% Below average
Read 165
Write 104
Mixed 122
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 9.66
54% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 50.5
DQ Mixed 9.72
15% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMT325S6EFR8A-PB 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback