Alienware X51 R3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware X51 R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 026CD3
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '19 at 01:11
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 398
53% 396 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
44.5% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 69.1
44% 62.4 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 52.2
46% 56.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 120GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 350
Write 310
Mixed 295
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 22.5
107% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 94.5
DQ Mixed 21.8
27% 46.2 MB/s
Transcend TS120GMTS820S 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 107 107 109 110 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 415
Write 370
Mixed 376
SusWrite 110
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 25.6
135% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 38.7
80% 158 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73%
Great: 79%
Ccboot iSCSI 128GB
68GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 107 106 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 318
Write 292
Mixed 280
SusWrite 105
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 23.8
111% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 90.7
DQ Mixed 21.8
27% 45 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 91%
Ccboot iSCSI 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 104 108 106 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 319
Write 295
Mixed 284
SusWrite 105
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 20
104% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.7
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 23.9
28% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 59%
Ccboot iSCSI 2TB
352GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 108 106 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
Read 314
Write 286
Mixed 273
SusWrite 105
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 20.3
106% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 94.9
DQ Mixed 20.1
27% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X51 R3 Builds (Compare 688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Alienware X51 R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback