Today's hottest deals

Megaware OEM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMegaware OEM  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110621
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 15:01
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 77.2
41% 61.9 Pts
4-Core 76.8
8-Core 78.4
10% 77.6 Pts
64-Core 77.2
5% 77.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 852C) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 38.3
36% 41.8 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 35
31% 38 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex PLUS R2 62GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 30 23 39 33 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 105
Write 54.8
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 32.1
12% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 5.1
32% 9.23 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 6.5
DQ Mixed 6.5
6% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 27%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
139GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 38 34 44 46 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 129
Write 129
Mixed 52
SusWrite 42.6
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback