Today's hottest deals

Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive4.47% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardIntel CRESCENTBAY  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150829
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 10 '19 at 14:01
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 151
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 237
26% 207 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Intel(8086 1616) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 0.09
5% 3.19 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 0.09
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSMS180S3128GJ 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 55 34 35 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
4.47% Terrible
Read 22.3
Write 185
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 36.5
15% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1
4% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
693GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 113 115 113 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 70
Write 118
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 113
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
176% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 70%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 77 131 135 138 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 166
Write 200
Mixed 85
SusWrite 125
193% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.3
252% 6.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.3 0.9 1 1 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Read 2.3
Write 15
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 5.3
10% 6.22 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
14% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback