Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel CRESCENTBAY  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150829
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 06:21
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 172
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 248
28% 217 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Intel(8086 1616) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 8
Parallax 7.19
5% 6.96 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 12
7% 8.44 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSMS180S3128GJ 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 437
Write 289
Mixed 76.2
58% 267 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 16.6
25% 7.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 80%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
696GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 109 104 104 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 69
Write 97.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 106
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
198% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK04 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 134 119 140 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 192
Write 195
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 133
196% 150 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.3
253% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback