Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.2 GB free of 14.9922 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20190109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 13:55
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 165
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 435
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla P40
Nvidia(10DE 11D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1807 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.9% Below average
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 168
Parallax 177
0% 115 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 171
Splatting 115
106% 130 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 162GB
151GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 277
Write 172
Mixed 194
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 18.9
58% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 168
130% 177 MB/s
Microsoft Virtual Disk 40GB
37GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 288
Write 163
Mixed 210
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 15.2
55% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 174
129% 170 MB/s
Xensrc PVDISK 91GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.5 3.6 4.3 3.9 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 287
Write 164
Mixed 198
SusWrite 4.1
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 16.9
50% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 184
140% 188 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 66%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 42GB
37GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 277
Write 163
Mixed 214
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 19.1
62% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 121
97% 136 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 64%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 268GB
249GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 163 159 165 168 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 94%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 107GB
100GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 136 162 162 157 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.1% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 22.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 15.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback