Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 01 '19 at 16:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 190
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 450
47% 377 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1.2GB
CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 20.5
15% 22.7 fps
MRender 31.1
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 20.7
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 128GB-$72
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 204 197 191 193 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.4% Good
Read 252
Write 222
Mixed 167
SusWrite 197
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 27.1
105% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 113
103% 158 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
779GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 101
Write 97.7
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 99.5
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 2,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback