Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M LE  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140620
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 07:58
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 95.5
1-Core 95
2-Core 190
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 374
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gigabyte(1458 3557) 1GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 23.8
16% 20.4 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 85 88 92 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 89.5
Write 89.2
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 83.5
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33
117GB free
Firmware: 3.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 56.3
Write 40.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 29.7
29% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 34%
Ut165 USB Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Read 14
Write 3
Mixed 4
SusWrite 3.4
6% 6.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback