Toshiba Satellite M305D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 52% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba Satellite M305D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Satellite M305D
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion X2 Ultra Mobile ZM-80
Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 2.4
2-Core 8.4
2% 5.4 Pts
4-Core 17.1
8-Core 17.9
2% 17.5 Pts
64-Core 8.3
0% 8.3 Pts
Poor: 24% Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics
Toshiba(1179 FF50) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.16
1% 0.66 fps
MRender 0.71
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 0.96
1% 0.68 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800BEVS-22RST0 80GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 26 28 29 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 29.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 28.1
20% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 0.4
MC Mixed 0.5
1% 0.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.4 GB/s
Latency 575
7% 575 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback