IBM System x3650 -[7979B9U]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemIBM System x3650 -[7979B9U]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM System Planar
Memory27 GB free of 28 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20081008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 22:42
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5450
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 76.2
39% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 341
30% 255 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 500GB
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 154 154 155 153 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.8% Average
Read 342
Write 254
Mixed 294
SusWrite 153
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 24.6
80% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 4.3
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 10.4
10% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 79%
Adaptec Array 440GB
410GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 79 81 78 81 85 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.4% Average
Read 303
Write 224
Mixed 340
SusWrite 82.2
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 24.7
80% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 32.3
DQ Mixed 28.1
21% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 28GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback