HP EliteBook 745 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 221C
Memory3.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 14:48
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7150B R5, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 46.7
1-Core 28.5
2-Core 37.5
26% 37.6 Pts
4-Core 58.8
8-Core 77.8
9% 68.3 Pts
64-Core 95.5
6% 95.5 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 221C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 5.59
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SS DSC2BX012T4 1TB
463GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G201
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 116
Write 90.8
Mixed 98.3
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 4.1
744% 4.97 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.5
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 3.9
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 745 G2 Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback