Supermicro X9DAX-HFT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X9DAX-HFT  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAX-HFT
Memory77 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 18:43
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 94
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 725
63% 539 Pts
64-Core 2,229
138% 2,229 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 190
Parallax 194
122% 177 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 176
Splatting 117
112% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FCCT960M500SSD1 960GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 75 212 210 181 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 363
Write 140
Mixed 319
SusWrite 170
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 26.7
94% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 178
136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 99%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
55GB free
Firmware: CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 99 90 91 90 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.4% Good
Read 255
Write 238
Mixed 230
SusWrite 112
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 34.8
114% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 172
135% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 118%
Adaptec Array 44TB
600GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.3 4.5 3.9 4.4 4.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
241GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 77 78 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 116
Write 125
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 76.5
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 87%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 138 135 141 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 132
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 137
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
296% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C HMT31GR7AFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C HMT31GR7AFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C HMT31GR7AFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C Sem... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 31
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.9
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DAX-HFT Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

System: Supermicro X9DAX-HFT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $49
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback