Asrock X99 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 14:03
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 194
64% 115 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 584
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
EVGA(3842 1999) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.2% Good
Lighting 99.8
Reflection 117
Parallax 99.7
81% 106 fps
MRender 81.3
Gravity 85.2
Splatting 0.13
40% 55.5 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 153 165 135 94 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 355
Write 189
Mixed 169
SusWrite 134
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 29.4
88% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 95
117% 208 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 107%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
930GB free
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1452 1534 1455 1571 1627 1617 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,300
Write 1,759
Mixed 1,054
SusWrite 1,543
372% 1,664 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 64.1
255% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1626
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 838
724% 1,092 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 318%
Great: 283%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 26
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 20.5
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 78%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 4TB
84GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 24.8
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 2.6
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 33.6
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 16
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 OC Formula Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback